Transformation of Nora in Henrik Isbens A Dolls House Essay -- Henri

Transformation of Nora in Henrik Isbens A Dolls HouseDuring the time in which Henrik Isbens evasive action, A Doll?s House, took place society frowned upon women asserting themselves. Women were supposed to play a role in which they supported their husbands, took c are of their children, and made sure everything was perfect around the house. Nora is pictured as a doll throughout the play until she realizes the truth about the worldly concern she lives in, and cuts herself free. Nora Helmer was a delicate character that had been pampered all of her life, by her father, and by Torvald. She in truth didnt have a care in the world. She didnt even have to care for the children the maid would usually take care of that. In every sense of the word, she was your emblematic housewife. Nora never left the house, mostly because her husband was afraid of the way people would talk. It really wasnt her fault she was the way she was it was mostly Torvalds for spoiling her. Nora relies on Torvald for everything, from movements to thoughts, much manage a puppet that is dependent on its puppet master for all of its actions. Her carefree spirit and somewhat childish manners are shown throughout the play with statements such as, Is that my little lark twittering out thither? (1). Is it my little squirrel bustling about? (2). A lark is a happy, carefree bird, and a squirrel is quite the opposite. If you are to squirrel away something, you were hiding or storing it, kind of like what Nora was doing with her bag of macaroons. It seems childish that Nora must hide things such as macaroons from her husband, but if she didnt and he found out, she would be deceiving him and going against his wishes which would be socially wrong. As the play goes on, Nora seems to transform from her delicate little character into something much more. At the end of act one, Krogstad goes to Nora for the recollection of the currency she had borrowed from him. You don?t mean that you will tell my husban d that I owe you money? (21). Since Nora was wrong in doing so socially, she could not tell Torvald or anyone else about her problem. Not only would that affect their social standard but also Torvalds ego, which inevitably would happen anyway. After Krogstad threatens to expose Nora for forging her fathers signature, she realizes that no social function what she does Torvald was going to know the truth. The flaw with... ...ying in a marriage since divorce was frowned upon during that era. Her decision was a succession for all expectations put on a char and wife by society. The story A Doll?s House is believable. It stands for every marriage where equality never took place. Many women knew their social status and lived as they were meant to, but for the few that realized there was more to the world then the sheltered life they were living, broke free. Nora was one of the women who knew her place and acted accordingly until she saw that her learn had no real value. She was not loo ked at as an individual, but she was seen as her fathers daughter or her husbands wife. The turning point for her decision to break free from this world and start her own life is very believable. She comes to see that her marriage isnt real. Nora no longer loves her husband and knows that he does not truly love her as well. She knows that there is so much more to discover in the world to understand, and until she does she will not allow another man to control her life.Works CitedIbsen, Henrik. A Dolls House. In Four Major Plays. Trans. James McFarlane and Jens Arup. Oxford Oxford University Press, 1981.